Commercialisation of Higher Education in South Africa


Introduction and Literature Review

South African schooling policies are a priority on addressing historic training imbalances. However, they should also be touchy to the demands of an ever-increasing worldwide information-driven environment. The educational machine can not be dominated with the aid of the needs of the domestic academic system of South Africa, ignoring the traits exerted through the global international (OEDC Annual Report, 2004: have forty-four). Higher education in South Africa should recognize that they perform and function in a understanding-driven worldwide environment. Each home and international student calls for admission to good excellent schooling on the fine, reliable higher education institutions inside the globe.

In this regard, complete definitions of internationalization of better training encompass the following: “Internationalisation is a system that prepares the network for successful participation in a more and more interdependent global … The manner infuses all sides of the put up-secondary education device, fostering international know-how and growing competencies for powerful living and working in a various global” (Francis, 1993 referred to through Patrick, 1997).

The position of higher education in South Africa needs to be evaluated considering the re-integration of South Africa into the global network. South Africa changed into hastily re-included into the world network by obtaining a nearly immediate club of influential worldwide organizations after 1994. Kishun (1998:59) indicated that South Afrhasbecome a member of amongst others the subsequent global establishments: United Nations; Organisation of African Unity; Commonwealth; International Olympic

Committee; Federation of International Football Associations; and Lome Convention. Integration of influential global establishments is necessary; however no longer sufficient pre-situation for internationalization of better education. Sustainable internationalization must be intently aligned to the emerging global developments and events within the education sector. An analysis of the basis on which internationalization of better education occurs is needed in addition to the blessings of the internationalization method. This study is conducted in opposition to this history.

Higher Education


Problem Statement

While South Africa is in a transition method regarding higher education to deal with the past imbalances, the query arises whether or not the South African academic region can compete in the global economy, which regards information as a commercialized commodity.


A pattern length of 781 respondents from six establishments of better schooling in South Africa turned into decided on. Senior college students were randomly selected using the benefit sampling approach. A semi-established questionnaire becomes evolved into measuring the perceived competitive profile of establishments of higher training in South Africa. The questionnaire constitutes five measuring foci, namely:

· Section A: Institutional records concerning the region in which the respondent is enrolled.

· Section B: Biographical statistics regarding gender, sort of pupil, and u . S . A. Of foundation.

· Section C: Decision standards used to choose an institution of higher schooling.

· Section D: Four competitive dimensions of higher schooling institutions, such as strategic competitiveness, institutional competitiveness, product competitiveness, and tactical competitiveness.

· Section E: Open-ended questions aimed to become aware of why respondents choose a selected group of higher education, their opinion on the institution’s aggressive recognition, and the factors that can affect the global competitiveness of the precise institution.

The records became converted into opposite categories, particularly people who agreed with the statements and people who disagreed, enabling the researchers to derive a hypothesized settlement-war of words distribution. Those who neither agreed nor disagreed have been allocated to the confrontation institution set giving and expected disagreement reaction established of fifty seven% (p=zero. Fifty-seven) and an agreement response set of forty-three% (q=zero. Forty-three).

The Binomial take a look at what became hired to determine whether or not the located distribution corresponds with the hypothesized distribution using importance. Take a look at the degree of 0.05. Furthermore, the extent of agreement or war of words with the chosen aggressive statements and the amplify of agreements between the respondents from the unique institutions on the various ideas have been decided by executing four statistical methods, precisely:

ANOVA to compare the manner of respondents from the notable establishments; figuring out how much of the perception version can be accounted for by the effect of the extraordinary institutions of higher training; determining the averages for every strategic size to gain an indication of the extent of agreement with the aggressive statements, and figuring out the same old deviations to gain an illustration of the amplify to which consensus exists within the pattern.